On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:45:07 -0800, Andy wrote in message 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > ..what had me wondering is the eng-rpm in the turbine-engine
> > section, where these word of wisdom appears:  ;o)
>  
> And what would you propose?  Turbine RPM is almost never quoted in
> real units, but in percentages.  Where is appropriate, the
> documentation tells you to specify "engine RPM".  Where it is not
> appropriate, it tells you to use "shaft RPM".  It even explains why.

..ah, missed that pie.  I agree %'s are more appropriate here, however I
feel the 100% rpm figures (that the %'s are calculated from), as such
will become useful as we start playing with shaft torque calculations to
make things like turbos from shaft driven superchargers and power
recovery turbines. 

> Seriously, if you want a change, ask for it.  All you are doing right
> now is nitpicking and pissing me off.  So, let me ask this just once,
> nicely, before I start yelling: is there an *actual* change to the
> YASim parser or documentation that you would like to see?

..not yet, the docs and source first needs a read, and I some more sleep
so the reading gets productive, it's been a while. (Never ever accept 
round-da-clock-to-meet-everlasting-deadlines just to get your business
going.)  I stand firm on the B29's R-3350 .35 gear ratio, though.  ;o)

..the other change I would like to see in YASim (and the other FDM's
too), is running independently like JSBSim can do, so we can simulate
one plane with several different networked FDM's to see how they differ
in responding to gusts, ice, vortices etc., should help debugging and
build better data on modelling new planes.  By independently, I mean
running YASim, LaRCSim, -UIUC etc outside of FlightGear, I see no need
to drag along dead weight, the graphics _is_ the heavy part of FG.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to