On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 09:08:05 -0700, Andy wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > Andy Ross wrote: > > > Yeah, but that's a bug. There is only one manifold pressure. > > > Surely you don't want *both* "mp-inhg" > > > and "supercharger-output-inhg", which mean exactly the same > > > thing. > > > > ..I beg to differ; flow always means there are flow losses. > > The discussion was about software, not engines. If you really > want to nit, we should be modelling the MP as a 3D scalar field, > so that the user can decide where to put the probe. :) ..aye. ;o) > The point was that there is no need for a new property to > represent the value displayed by the manifold pressure gauge. ..agreed, and my point was just "keep open space for code modelling those losses, until it is written." -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
