"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
> Personally, I think that the idea of threading in the context of
> FlightGear is a *very* scary idea, especially from the standpoint of
> long term maintanence and keeping our code robust. I'd perhaps favor
> splitting our code out into separate applications that use networking or
> shared memory or pipes to communicate.
I suspect more people would jump on this train if we manage to agree on
the idea, that platform independent interfaces were a "good thing" (TM).
We should 'hijack' this thread to start a discussion about wether it
makes sense simply to take the current network interface protocols as
given and write them down in some sort of an 'official' interface
description.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
