Melchior FRANZ wrote:
It's not the UFO that's superfluous, but the discussion about its
removal. I wouldn't even list it as an aircraft that's up for
discussion. Sheesh.
Good point. I would drop it from the aircraft list, but not from
distribution. It's no real aircraft and doesn't use real space, so no
point in blocking another aircraft for it.
Generally I'd say the most developed aircrafts should be included. It's
all about first impression here, as everyone can download additional
aircrafts without much hassle. The first impression should just be as
good as possible, so the included collection should show as much of
FlightGear as possible. There's no use in being technically perfekt and
having thousands of features if the users won't see it.
My two cents...
Nine
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
