> From: James Turner > <snip> > De-lurking for a moment,I recall the original intention was to include at > least one aircraft > from each common category (single, light twin, heavy > twin, bizjet, etc). The new criteria > seems to be features / polish / completion - I'm not arguing which criteria > makes more sense > for a 0.9.9 or 1.0 release, but that's why the c310 is in, > as I understand it - in the absence > of a Baron or Diamond TwinStar, it's the only light twin that really exists > with a model and > cockpit. It's had very little love, and the default skin > has been the military variant, which > a few people have objected too in the > past.If the argument about 'covering the categories' > still holds, then replacing the c310 with b1900d is moot - for sure the b1900 > should go in, > because it's polished and slick, but it's a totally different class of > aircraft (replacing > the DC-3 with the b1900d would be more equivalent, but there are other > reasons the DC3 is > nice)Anyway, I guess all I'm really saying is, it sounds as if the criteria > for inclusion have > shifted changed, and that's fine, but it might put the existing aircraft > selection from 0.9.8 > in a new perspective.JamesPS - any time someone wants to do the TwinStar, I > am prepared to > offer all kinds of bribery! Cash, beer, you name it! --
Still behind on reading the list. I agree with James here. Also it should be pointed out that the quality of the JSBSim FDM for the c310 is very high even though the eye candy is limited. Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
