On Friday 12 May 2006 08:21 am, Steve Hosgood wrote:
> What I meant was, regardless that most of the physical measurements are
> missing from jsbsim's .xml files, **Aeromatic** should have a way of
> specifying them so that it can produce the right "magic" coefficients.
>
> Yet it doesn't. Aeromatic is good at what it does, but would be nice it
> it handled some of the other possible physical parameters of a basic
> aircraft. Dihedral and wing incidence would seem obvious ones.


Well, wing incidence *is* one of the configuration items that can go into a 
JSBSim configuration file.

As for dihedral, I think you're still not getting the methodology of JSBSim.  
In JSBSim you don't specify the dihedral, you specify the *effect* of 
dihedral.

Dave


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to