"Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> Let's hope that you're correct. Right now we have _fewer_ features, and a
> _lower_ frame rate. I hope that adding back the features we used to have
> won't further reduce the frame rate, let alone adding new ones.
Hey, guys, you're talking about a _development_ source code tree, don't
forget about this!! It's funny to realize that people got used to have
such a consistent and stable development tree that they already see the
whole project at risk just because _real_ development is currently
taking place :-)
Mathias did a huge task to make the switch over to OSG actually happen.
Apparently the next item on the TODO list is to remove the glitches of
the port and do some fine tuning, afterwards to remove the dirty hacks
that had been implemented in the PLIB version - and which are still
present - and add them as a 'clean' solution to the OSG version.
Don't feel to be looking at the dark side of the moon just because
your field-glasses got dirty ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
