* Mathias Fröhlich -- Sunday 03 December 2006 12:56: > I still build upon the patched osg-1.2 version. > So I will only do that change in cvs if most of the others tell me that they > want to use osg-cvs too.
I'd prefer if fgfs relied on osg-cvs. That way one can easily follow osg development (such as the recently added volumetric shadows), as having both versions installed is IMHO rather painful. And fgfs/osg isn't really fully usable (for me) anyway, so an instable dependency isn't a problem. If our next release is osg based, then it can't rely on a forked osg version, anyway. m. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
