On 02/25/2007 04:49 PM, Martin Spott wrote: > John, a significant part of introducing yourself to the list - the one > our readers will probably remember best - was you strongheaded > instisting of how to read VOR radials.
Well: 1) As you know, I changed my mind about how to report radials. 2) The case under discussion was an exceptional case; we all agreed on the other 9 out of 10 cases. It was also grossly off-topic. 3) I was telling the truth about how *I* reported radials, based on my training and my experience talking to New York approach ... who are not known for being unskillful nor over-tolerant of unskillful pilots. Maybe I was wrong all along, maybe practices have changed over time, or maybe it was a regional thing. I don't know and don't much care. I am willing to learn and change over time. 4) Please consider the possibility that someone can be wrong without being dishonest, stupid, or evil. I'm pretty sure I'm not the only person who has ever been wrong. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
