On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 19:06 +0200, gh.robin wrote: > On Fri 3 August 2007 18:49, Hans Fugal wrote: > > On 8/3/07, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Stuart Buchanan -- Thursday 26 July 2007: > > > > It interpolates METAR changes over time as follows: > > > > > > Committed, thanks. This was sorely missing, but I'm afraid > > > we'll get complaints because the real-life-weather "doesn't > > > work any more". (No more obvious weather changes shaking the > > > aircraft. ;-) > > > > A good reply would be, find a real-world crosswind situation and try > > to land. :-) > > > > > > But you can fly through a storm and get these changes shaking the Aircraft, > isn't it ?
>From http://www.airnav.com/airport/KHIF : - CAUTION: HVY AIRLINE AND CIV TFC ON APCH AND DEP. STRICT ADHERENCE TO ATC ALT AND HDG MANDATORY. EXP TURBULENCE APCH AND LDG RWY 14 DUR MED TO HI SFC WINDS. WIND VELOCITY MAY VARY FR APCH TO DEP END OF RWY. The current weather system usually put the weather "wall" over the runway, I'm hoping the new interpolation patch is smart enough to change the weather fast enough... Since the two metar sources are only six miles apart I'm hoping the wind change will be very rapid, but harder to detect than the "wall" method. I haven't really looked at the patch (too many irons in the fire) Ron ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
