* Tim Moore -- Saturday 13 October 2007:
> If I had received only objections, I wouldn't have checked it in.

I and AJ objected. Andy suggested an alternative (trying .osg and
.ac on objects with no explicit extension), which I don't exactly
consider an agreement. Nobody agreed, but Vivian and Jon tested
your patch. Jon reported no speed improvement. (This is not from
memory, but from the IRC log.)

It's not that I can't deal with getting overruled. But it's IMHO
not acceptable to ignore all objections. The way to go would
have been to discuss the problem again here on the list, *before*
just committing. Either it can be resolved, or better solutions
are found. And if nobody cares to comment, you can still set a
deadline of a few days after which you would commit.

m.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to