Hi Chris, I've updated the scenery last night, buildings of terminal1 add more realistic feeling to EDDF. :) I really enjoy flying there.
When I was measuring parking positions, I have always put the marker on the yellow line, but I was unsure which part of the aircraft (front, center, back) should be matched. So it can happen that aircraft are parking a bit too close or too far to the building, but I expect no error in the direction perpendicular to aircraft's front/back axis. I'm going to export all the parking positions into a kml file, and load them into Google Earth, to check. I'll let you know the result. Regards, Gabor On Wednesday 12 March 2008 00:54, Christian Schmitt wrote: > Hi Gabor, > > > This problem can come from two sources, the parking positions can be > > defined wrong, or the position or scale of the buildings can be wrong. Or > > both. :) > > Now with more and more parts of the terminals being added, I encounter > more errors with the aircraft positions again (the big ones like 747 > stand partly in the building). The gate in the middle (Gate B) has this > problem. I don't say it's not my fault. As I put the buildings together > and position them in relation to their neighbours, errors might add up. > So I'm still working on correcting this. But to rule out any other error > source I just want to know how precisely you defined the parking positions? > > Greetings > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
