On lun 31 mars 2008, Vivian Meazza wrote: SNIP > > > > Even on my old PC with a FX5200 OSG run very pretty at > > least. > > It is true that OSG is slower than plib- but the > > graphic is much better (exxept the 3D-clouds and the > > missing shadows)- please not another discussion about > > OSG vs Plib! > > CoreDuo 2,6 Ghz and a Gainward 8800GT. Not surprised it runs well!!! In > particular I think the CoreDuo does threading better than the P4. In case > you haven't noticed, the 7600gs is coping easily with the output from > FG-OSG - that's why the frame rates didn't increase. > > And what would Vsync do? The frame rate never gets anywhere near the point > at which it might operate. I've tried frame-rate-throttle - it just makes > it worse. The graphics are absolutely no different here between OSG or plib > that I can see, and why should they be? > > Could we have some _real_ numbers to compare instead of hearsay. > > This is not a OSG versus plib discussion - it's a why OSG is so poor on XP > discussion > > Vivian > > >
Hello, Vivian You are right :) AND, with Linux and the same Graphics Card 7800 GS 512 MB, i can notice the same decrease of performance from FG-PLIB to FG-OSG , I ever had about 20% less performance with OSG. I am running FG on AMD ATHLON 3200 (32 bit) with AGP mothercard. May be OSG is more accurate with modern (recent) CPU. (i must test it). Cheers -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
