--- On Sat, 4/10/08, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Durk Talsma -- Saturday 04 October 2008:
> > Given that we have an OSG branch that has undergone
> significant
> > development this year, and a PLIB branch, with little or no
> > development, I would strongly urge that the main release would
> > be OSG based.
>
> I agree. The PLIB branch was only kept alive for a short time
> after the 1.0 release, just for the case that we missed some
> really bad bugs and needed to make a bugfix release. Making
> another release from that would be rather pointless, and not
> help to convince people that fgfs is not "dead".
> Rather the opposite.
I think a release is a great idea. Thanks in advance for all the work you will
be doing!
I'll second Melchior's comments on PLIB vs. OSG - even with the known
deficiencies, an OSG release would be by far the best.
> > PLIB based maintenance release: 1.0.1
> > OSG based main release: 1.1.0 (or 1.2.0)
>
> I like the idea of an 1.9 release from the OSG branch. This
> makes clear that it's one step before a major release 2.0,
> and that there were fundamental changes (additions and also
> temporary losses). We could easily explain why clouds/shadows
> are missing there, and it might attract new developers who
> are interested and knowledgable in OSG.
I think this numbering scheme makes sense.
-Stuart
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
