On samedi 17 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote: > Brian Schack wrote: > > There are several huge and very unnatural walls in the Himalayas, both > > running NS and EW. I'll give the line of latitude or longitude that > > the wall runs along, and the end coordinates of the walls: > > The underlying SRTM elevation data is known to have many voids in the > Himalayan area and a reasonable explanation _might_ be that the void > filling in TerraGear doesn't provide too realistic results. > For your own experience, you'll find a copy of the respective elevation > raster here as a geo-referenced 1x1 degree TIFF image: > > > ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/GIS/GISData/SRTM/version2/GeoTIFF/Eurasia/N28 >E083.tif > > Note that these images have a 16-bit grayscale channel, therefore > simple "visual debugging" on a typical PC screen might be quite tricky > due to limited colour depth. In order to get a better clue about the > reported errors I'd consider it as being highly desirable looking at a > similar error at a place which is located at a much lower elevation. > > Cheers, > Martin. Because of some reason i mostly do use the old FG 0.9.8 scenery I have flown over Himalaya mountains looking for hole, wall or flat part , nothing. :) only mountains :)
here snapshots of the Everest http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/f16-everest_1.jpg http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/f16-everest_2.jpg So older data were right. Cheers -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. Voltaire ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
