Brian Schack wrote:
> Given that we have this weirdness in the Himalayas, my first
> inclination is to check the underlying data. Atlas and FlightGear
> both showed the same problem, so this indicates that the problem is
> not with Atlas or FlightGear, but with the data they use.
FlightGear and Atlas are loading the same Scenery tiles, I guess. So,
either the underlying data is erroneous (we know it is) or the
processing stage is at fault as well. Unless we have a reasonable
analysis of the input data for the 'faulty' Scenery tiles I'd hesitate
to spend too much time on inspecting the raster processing.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
