Jari Häkkinen wrote: > Ideally for macs, alut should be removed altogether but that is probably > not an viable option. The second best option would be to include alut
I disagree, alut has one important feature: it supports all supported WAV files on all supported platforms. So if the audio works on the development platform it'll work everywhere. No surprises that some plane doesn't work on Macs. And that's the reason I would go for FreeALUT, it supports more compression types: raw, ulaw, alaw and adpcm. > function declarations for the 5 backward compatibility function in the > Apple OpenAL framework in soundmgr_openal.hxx (or cxx if they does not > need to be exposed, alut is only used in soundmgr_openal.cxx, I think > ... I still have a lot of fg code to read). Is there planned increased > use of alut functionality? If not, then the choice is a no-brainer. A No, In fact I've removed some alut functionality in the overhauling process. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
