On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:24:23 +0100, Durk wrote in message <200912142224.24136.d.tal...@xs4all.nl>:
> On Monday 14 December 2009 12:11:15 pm Stuart Buchanan wrote: > > > > I think one statement can easily be used for both purposes if > > written appropriately. > > Agreed. That's actually what I was thinking of. > > > > > I'd appreciate feedback, even if it is only to agree with the > > wording of the statement, to ensure that we have buy-in for this. > > > > In addition to the points brought up by others, I have one suggestion > for a FAQ item: From the discussion on the flight simulator network, > it struck me that people (especially those with a freeware > background) don't necessarily understand why we are "allowing" third > parties to make money off of FlightGear. I guess this is already > covered by the "is it legal to resell" FAQ item, but maybe it's worth > to specifically address this question from a different perspective > (i.e. that of somebody coming from a freeware background)? > > Cheers, > Durk ..the freebee crowd often get their warez the same way they get their music, and may even have seen sheet music, allowing our banal "sheet music is for music binaries, like what source code is for flight simulator binaries." -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
