On 03/10/2010 01:47 AM, Torsten Dreyer wrote: > I did not commit the 6-axes fix for the following reason:
> If we change the protocol anyway, why not do it right an support the maximum > number of axes from plib (currently 16)? The following idea is better: > I'd suggest sending the number of axes in the first 32bit word followed by a > 32bit word for each used axes. "Doing it right" means supporting an _arbitrary_ number of axes, not 6 or 16. Also an arbitrary number of buttons. Just because plib is currently limited to 16 does not mean FG should make the same mistake. Over the years FG has become progressively less vulnerable to the limitations of plib. It is easy to foresee a day when all plib dependencies have been removed from FG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
