On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Rob Oates <carrotr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm, why not change the license on some of the newer planes to a more
> restrictive creative commons license? This would give you more control over
> how these are used. For instance, you could apply the license so the planes
> could only be use for non-commercial/free projects, and if a commercial
> project wanted to use your planes then they would have to request permission
> to use them.
>
> I think that is a fair trade off. Besides commercial companies should be
> trying to improve the underlying Flight Dynamic Model and terrain system ...
> not trying to getting rich quick off of our pretty planes.
>
> The GPL license should apply some probably just a handful of planes.
>
> my 2 cents....
>
> I'm not so keen on mixing my GPled code contributions with non-GPLed
content.
Tim
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
