On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 19:20 +0100, HB-GRAL wrote: > willie schrieb: > > > > +1 to that, brother > > There are many excellent sites out there using simple html and > > intelligent CSS. I don't see why we can't be one of them. Keep it simple > > and fast. > > > 1+ to the whole usability and design consortium here. > > When you read the whole thread you see that this is not an issue of > usability nor new design or flash. We have a very good, consistent > proposal since many weeks from Pete here. And there is no logical > argumentation at the moment why his good work is not used. > > -Yves
But his good work _IS_ being used, extensively - 1 left TOC 2 CSS design 3 XHTML 1.0 I have added a little more today... http://geoffair.net/fg/site including a bottom TOC - presently not quite the same as the left, but it will be... What other design elements are you suggesting? There does not seem any need to go totally Googly when all that Pete has done can be done to the current site, in an incremental page-by-page way... Am I missing something here? Regards, Geoff PS: Also agree with the sentiments of others concerning 'flash'... see my - http://geoffair.net/fg/site/README.site.html#avoid where I also suggest NOT using a CMS (php/MySQL) system... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
