On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Peter Morgan <pete[at]freeflightsimdotorg> wrote: > This aint working for me.. > its a 2.5gig package and lots of bandwith for the "core" pancake.
> the core "snaphost" includes ALL the aircraft and more that 40%+ abandoned.. > redundant space. shite load of DEAD files... > Aircraft deginers cannot MOVE beacause it means updating whole tree.. > Coders (eg c++) don't not want to entertain data updates and scripts.. > The NAV.dat cant be updates cos its a huge data set, even though it would be > better uncompressed.. > Guess were gonna be watching "stagnationion" for a period until somone > upstairs and in a postion can help to solve the problem.. > There are a few idea, but as usual it needs management approval.. and plan.. > if any... > In the mean time.. there is NO incentive to move.. and not plan forwith.. > FG will suffer..Scenery et all will Missing Tag??: rant Feel like making some positive suggestions? I'm not going to address all of the constructive points above as the tone expressed in the above email doesn't warrant a full response but will address . The file nav.dat is a database supplied by Robin Peel and (AFAIK) is not intended to be updated by the FG project. If there are mistakes or omissions they should be submitted upstream. Regards George ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
