Maintaining an obsolete apt.dat is a waste of time. Better teaming up on
integrating the current 8.5 format.
It works perfectly on X-Plane so why shouldn't it do the same in FG.
--- On Sun, 6/6/10, Ron Jensen <w...@jentronics.com> wrote:
From: Ron Jensen <w...@jentronics.com>
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Uncompressing apt.dat et al
To: "FlightGear developers discussions" <flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sunday, June 6, 2010, 7:27 AM
On Saturday 05 June 2010 20:51:45 George Patterson wrote:
> The file nav.dat is a database supplied by Robin Peel and (AFAIK) is
> not intended to be updated by the FG project. If there are mistakes or
> omissions they should be submitted upstream.
>
> Regards
>
>
> George
However, I think it would be better to unzip nav.dat and apt.dat in our git so
that local changes can be made and tracked. We are staying with an obsolete
version of apt.dat for the near future so Robin won't be maintaining it for
us.
Thanks,
Ron
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
