Am 21.03.11 22:12, schrieb ThorstenB: > > I just noticed though, that a number of wiki pages again returned to > recommend the use of latest OSG-svn *sigh*. I don't know why people keep > recommending that... > > cheers, > Thorsten >
Because it is valid ;-) Maybe not trunk, thats always dangerous, but 2.9.9 seems to work for OSX. I see right now I did a bad mistake in OSG configuration cocoa vs. carbon. There is no Xcode support anymore with OSG 2.9.9 and there have been some changes in default cmake configuration. Oi, oi, oi. Coming back here means reading two weeks list/forum/wikis, compiling two weeks (13 days for OSG, 1 day for sg/fg), buying a new machine, do it all again, but finally: I am always happy. Now I am building again, also because I see that the hudson nightlies are working with 2.9.9 on OSX 10.6. Sorry for this confusion. I hope the new compiled OSG libs will solve all my "issues" posted the last two days. And after that I follow the thread "Quiet". Cheers, Yves ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
