On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:19:09 +0200, Erik wrote in message <1301987949.1641.2.camel@Raptor>:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 01:59 +0200, kreuzritter2000 wrote: > > Am Montag, den 04.04.2011, 19:01 +0200 schrieb Erik Hofman: > > ha mAa > GPL2 or later, which doesn't mean the license of > > the version in the > > > base package can be changed to GPL3 without my permission. > > > > > > Erik > > > > No, this is exactly allowed. > > That's the reason why the two words "or later" were added, when the > > GPLv2 was created. > > No it's not. This is my model an placing my distribution under GPL3 > restricts it's license. Anyone is free to fork the Fokker-100 and > place it under the terms of GPL3 but the one in the base package is > GPL2 (or later) period. > > Erik ..you're still not making sense to me, you're saying "No it's not", then that e.g. FlightProSim.com "is free to fork your Fokker-100 and place it under the terms of GPL3 but the one in the base package is GPL2 (or later) period." ;o) ..I'm guessing you meant to say your fokker100 is going to stay under the same license as the rest of the base package, now it's GPLv2-and-later, later it may be GPLv3, GPLv3.1, GPLv4 etc as it is developed and forked etc to fit new FG things. :o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
