On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:38:26 +0200, Tuomas wrote in message <-1192042695539871148@unknownmsgid>:
> Sure, but it was his former homebase which he remembered by heart. I > am not saying they are not useful in an emergency, but as they are > not official airports, there is no guarantee the runway is even > suitable for landing or takeoff. Hence the question whether they > should be part of the airport data at all. > > > Of course it would be nice to have them in the scenery with white > X-marks on the runway.. ..not to mention fences across the runway or around new industrial etc buildings on it... closure dates field in database? A few has had more than one "permanent" closures, e.g. "Lille Rygge" near ENRY. ..model air strips? Since we have RC models? Some use X'es and still have ultralights visiting. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
