On Sunday 12 August 2012 16:07:18 Martin Spott wrote: > Whereas there's little use of TerraSync without the FG flight sim, > there are plausible usage scenarios for FGCom _without_ FlightGear, > let's say for ATC. Therefore, while it makes sense to package FGCom > alongside with FlightGear for the releases, I'm having mixed feelings > about incorporating FGCom into FlightGear core because this would > either: > a) require to bear all the ballast of FG even if the only thing you'd > like to have is FGCom, if FGCom development moves into FG or > b) carry the risk of FGCom-in-FG diverge from standalone FGCom.
But it's not an either/or. There could be an FGCom binary that uses the same code as the built-in FGCom. Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
