On Sunday, 12 December 2004 14:02, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:16:03 +0200, Paul wrote in message > > Yet another reason why I would love to see everything integrated into > > the FlightGear binary > > ..I disagree, big fat binaries get fat and bloated and draggy.
I don't see how adding a flight planner, aircraft selection and other useful features is going to bloat the code so much that is runs like a snail. Maybe if we were writing a mini OS into FG it would slow things down but you'll have to add millions of lines of code before it becomes a real issue. FG is written in C++ and not some crappy interpreted language like VB. According to your reasoning we should remove all the menu entries such as the weather selection and the property browser so that FG runs faster. Paul _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
