> We really need to get this fixed. The client should set the desired
> port to zero to get an "ephemeral" port number. The server should
> reply to the source port always, and should use a well-known port
> number that we standardize (and should probably store in
> preferences.xml).
Also I believe os (Oliver Schroeder) has already got a version of
the server which doesn't need anymore firewall/NAT fiddling.
> Then the *only* piece of information a user needs to know is the
> server address, which Curt could hopefully set up for us as
> "mp.flightgear.org" or somesuch.
Sounds cool :)
Pigeon.
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
