Le mardi 29 novembre 2005 à 13:36 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit :
> 
> > Thanks for that late answer, 
> > i am patient , that was never explained.
> > when we ask for explanation, we get nothing. :=(
> 
> You posted about it re: 0.9.8, but lots of airports were sketchy with
> 0.9.8 and things were intended to be fixed in 0.9.9.  Unfortunately, that
> didn't work out because of unexpected problems.
> 
> Your first post pointing out that LFPO (and others) were messed up in the
> 0.9.9 scenery was only a day ago.  It's not uncommon, on this and other
> mailing lists, to have to wait for several days, or even a week or more,
> to get a response to a question -- people are busy.  In most of the mailing
> lists to which I'm subscribed, the mailing list guidelines/netiquette advice
> suggests waiting a week or two before reposting questions that didn't get
> a reply.  
> 
> -c
> 
> 
Sorry to go against your opinion, 
fortunately the during same period i gave  that information  an other
thread about error in airport data was animated.
and some specific manager where there to discuss.
No feedback on my side, !!!!!!!!!!?????????
Your remark does not suit to that specific case.
Sorry for you.
-- 
Gerard


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to