Nitro wrote: > Am 21.11.2008, 16:34 Uhr, schrieb Robert Cunningham >> PS: My $0.02 on coordinate transforms would be to include them in the >> fabric of FC2
I agree also -- when I said that geo-referencing an image (or the equivalent for non-geo imagery) was not FC's job, I meant that it isn't FC's job to figure out what the transform should be. But it is FC's job to apply whatever transforms the user needs. Indeed one of the key features driving the need for a refactor was the need to apply arbitrary transforms. > Now if it turns out most people on this list use a common set of > transformations (map projections, ...) I'm open to include these as a > library into the standard distribution of fc2. > Fast numpy implementations preferred :-) agreed -- a like the idea of a library of assorted useful stuff -- certainly transforms, and maybe even add-ons that help you reference imagery, but they should be seen as add-ons, not part of the core library. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ FloatCanvas mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mithis.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/floatcanvas
