Michael Sweet wrote: > ... renam[ing] of everything from Fl_/fl_foo to fltk::foo > seems like a waste of effort.
I used to hold a similar opinion: That "using namespace foo;" was yet another needless C++ feature/hack that only reflected a lack of naming imagination on the part of the author, but I'm beginning to change my mind. I don't think Bill's idea is to rename "Fl_Foo" to "fltk::Foo", but to use the pristine form: "Foo". Yes, it would be a substantial effort, but namespaces are probably the Right Way(tm), and perhaps are worth the effort. Jim Wilson Caveat: I am not a developer, and would likely be less affected by this change. However, I would embrace the change and happily incorporated it into my FLTK-using code. _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
