Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > ... > AFAICS there are 25 developers in the list. > > I can't remember to have seen activities of 9 of 'em, > but this may be wrong, if my memory fails. > > IIRC, it has been discussed to split developer access > in groups, but has not been done, because there are > only so few developers, and Mike (?) argued that they > (we :-) ) can trust the developers, only to do, what they > know about, or similar ... > > So, why bother ? > > Let's wait until Mike chimes in ... > (now it's about 5 am in (parts of) the USA).
We can review the current active developers on fltk.org against their commits, and "retire" the ones that haven't committed anything in, say, 2 years. Simiarly, we can move inactive developers from the "core developer" section to "other contributors" in the 1.3 CREDITS file. As for segmenting/grouping access for specific developers, until we have a problem I don't want to bother with that. The few times we've had developers step on each other's changes would not have been prevented by grouping, and I would rather encourage a sense of trust and cooperation between the active developers than put each of them in their own "cone of silence"... :) -- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike at easysw dot com _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
