Fabien it is not a bad idea. However, there are some people who are unfortunately not with us anymore, but who contributed a lot. IMHO those guys should be in the list of developers anyway, because they earned their names to be on the list forever. :) This said, I propose we take a look not just inactivity, but also level of contribution for those inactive developers.
Fabien Costantini wrote: >>>> Maybe a purge would be in order? >>> This said, it would be a bit harsh to purge the list, >> I'm not sure that is so. A purge, certainly of inactive names, possibly >> of "less active" too, might be useful. > > At least I guess what we could do (without harming anyone) is: > > - Send a mail to all devs in list to acknowledge if they are still alive. > non response after a reasnable time would lead to remove the developer > access. This could change after explicit demand of the formmer developer but > subject to a new request/approval. > > - Split the lists in 2, because obviously (and regrettably) fltk1 and > fltk2 have less and less in common as for today > > I can bet that this would already cleanup and settle things quite well ... > > Fabien _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
