> As Bill mentioned elsewhere, it is possible to distinguish > between small > int values and pointers as the pointers have relatively large values > (using low adderesses for OS etc)
How robust a hack assumption is that? I'm wondering about systems (increasingly common these days) that do address randomisation and so forth to enhance security... Does the address randomisation mean that the assumption that a small value is not a valid address fails? -- Ian SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems Limited Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132 ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ******************************************************************** _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
