I agree that there are still some grouped comments and other little annoyances that you can find un doc., but it should be noted that:
- It does not prevent the user to understand the API at least as good as in the former html 1.1 documentation. - The most important thing is to focus on correctness and completion of the documentation, more than on aesthetics. As an example, I would probably prefer that Greg adds first some details on Fl_Browser use as he proposed, rather than correcting a grouped get/set comment ... Of course doing both would be even better ! Fabien. > Duncan Gibson wrote: > > > > I hope the others won't mind me saying this, but the initial conversion > > was very much a "let's add doxygen comment tags around the existing > > docs" effort. That meant that the bulk of the documentation became > > available in the doxygen generated html in a very short period. There > > are still a lot of things that need to be improved. > > [...] > > I couldn't have said it better! > > Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
