> > Oh, which reminds me, did I mention libunicode which solves > > basically all of this? > > http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/libunicode/ by Tom Tromey > > Markus Kuhn's paper http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html > mentions various libraries that do some/all of what we want, > but if we pull in ICU or pango can we still be fast and light?
Indeed. It's a worry. Way back when I did the 1.1.8-utf8 stuff, I did actually embark on getting pango integrated. But I very quickly lost heart... It's not going to be trivial. Since then I looked at ICU, and in some ways that might suit us better (and might even be better known, in that it forms the basis for a lot of Unicode handling in java for example.) Again, I failed to produce anything of any use. And neither is "light"... Libunicode I was aware of, but have not looked at in any detail. I'll maybe try and have a look. How do we feel about these libs as dependencies? Do we handle this any differently than we handle the image libs? -- Ian SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems Limited Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132 ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ******************************************************************** _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
