> Agreed. Although the device abstraction is very interesting, it would > IMHO be too big to do it before the release of 1.3.0. We can merge > the current printing support back in the main 1.3 branch, and then > we can release 1.3 after fixing the remaining UTF-8 things. With or > without Linux/PS printing, if this would be too complicated or too > bad with only printing images.
Yes. > Full device abstraction should then be the next step and consequently > in the next release 1.4 (unless the 2.0 merger would happen as well, > and this would be 3.0). Yes. > But I think that we should do device abstraction > _before_ trying to do the 2.0/1.x merger. Yes. SELEX Galileo Ltd Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132 ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ******************************************************************** _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
