On 18 May 2010, at 19:24, Duncan Gibson wrote: > Me: >> The downside is that although the fl_utf8decode() strategy >> (with CP1252 C1 0x80-0x9f conversion) is a lot safer than >> the fl_utf8len() one, it is certainly not as Fast and Light. > > Well on my box, the following program says it's approx 1.5 : 1.
That doesn't sound so bad then - not as bad as I had feared, anyway! _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list fltk-dev@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
