We avoided "bool" in the past because it was not supported in older versions of C++.
However, given that we are discontinuing support for GCC 2.x, now is probably the right time to use bool for any boolean values in the FLTK API. On Nov 9, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > Do we officially (want to) use "bool" in FLTK 1.3 ? > > There are some places in the code where it's used already [1], but > AFAICT bool was not used in FLTK, or at least it was not the > *usual* way to define boolean values. FLTK 2.0, however, uses bool > frequently. > > If we start using bool, are there known drawbacks (e.g. converting > function arguments), or something else? At least it's only defined > for C++ (not C)... > > Would there be any incompatibilities to be expected, if we changed > some methods' API ? > > Any opinions ? > > Albrecht > _______________________________________________ > fltk-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev ________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
