On 27.05.2011, at 20:24, Greg Ercolano wrote:

> Ian MacArthur wrote:
>> On 24 May 2011, at 21:31, Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
>> I don't see either of those as blockers - though be nice to get to the 
>> bottom of 2639, as in my testing the behaviour was puzzling... I never use 
>> Fl_Pack though, so not really sure what I'd expect!
> 
>    #2647 looks pretty bad; copy/paste from common apps can crash the app,
>    according to the OP. He has a simple patch that looks kinda OK, see
>    my comments.

Ok, just within hours of the new RC we get two new bugs, one of them crashes 
the app. So according to our release plan, I *must* do another RC.

But I already *know* that no matter how long I wait until the RC, I will not 
get a bug report. As soon as the RC is out, within a day, the patches will 
start flying in.

So I wonder: either this is just bad luck and the bread always falls on the 
side with the jam on it, or you guy were called in by my worst enemy to drive 
me insane ;-).

But what shall we do? Change the release policy? Make RC6 final and push 1.3.1 
out a few weeks form now? Make an RC7? Now? In two weeks? I really don't know. 
Please suggest... .

_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
fltk-dev@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Reply via email to