Hi,Bill, Thanks for great input, Now I have a much better idea about some of code in fltk2. As long as fltk3 is simple and fast, I would no longer care whether fltk3 is compatible with fltk1/fltk2 or not.
> I think I had better respond to some of this. > > The original post echoes a lot of my frustration with what happened to > FLTK. It grew insanely complex but with a lot of primitive stuff baked > in, and unless that stuff is removed it is never going to speed up. > _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
