On 31.12.2007, at 14:51, Stan wrote: >> On 26 Dec 2007, at 15:21, Stan wrote: > >> Stan, One thing I wondered is; How capable is the PC that you are >> using as your terminal? Even if it's a bit of an old clunker, I'd >> guess it would still compile and run fltk-1.1.x OK? That would at >> least give you a "second opinion" when you come up against these >> oddities that *might* be due to your more unusual setup? > > Ian, it would be hard to do for non-technical reasons. I do hope > that having these questions crop up now and again isn't too > burdensome for the group.
Just out of curiosity: I have a 50% version of FLTK using the VNC protocol to render the GUI. No X server required, just a VNC client on the receiving end. It does not have a window manager though, but for minimal apps, it works nicely. I was wondering if that would be an interesting thing for FLTK in general, and - since this is close to what you do - something that would make life easier for you (your opinion)? Matthias ---- http://robowerk.com/ _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
