Hi Asif,
> Is 2.0 a complete re-write or a a better c++ wrapper over existing code?
At the risk of overstepping my bounds, I'd argue that it's both! :-P
At least, this seems to be the intention. The fltk/compat files attempt to
create a rewrite over the old 1.x branch, but internally things operate
differently, too.
Of course, the major thing about 2.0 is that, unlike 1.3, it's not even *close*
to bug free.
A few other major differences between 1.3 and 2.0 include the c++ namespace and
the use of relative instead of absolute coordinates. On top of that, it's also
*slightly* easier to custom-skin widgets globally, etc. Oh, and 1.3 also
compiles on newer Macs. That's also a fairly major difference, for the time
being.
HTH,
Ben
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
