On 17.08.2012, at 14:06, "MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)" <ian.macart...@selexgalileo.com> wrote:
>> Just in case anyone fancies playing along at home, and did not see the >> original posts in the STR, here's the version of the test code I'm >> currently using, based on the OP's post but tweaked to build on my system, >> and a small Makefile to build it with... > > Just for kicks'n'giggles I ported the code to WinXP using the > QueryPerformanceCounter() API to get timings, and I get... > > $ ./qix > New control cost 0.02(ms) > Show window cost 20.73(ms) > > ian.macarthur@DESDAF599172 /d/examples/qix-win-times I get 0/166ms on OS X which is not surprising though because OS X allocates multiple buffers for each window and calculates animation and transparencies. 121ms are spent in Fl::show 96ms to open the connection to the display 25ms to create and show the OS window 45ms spent in Fl::run/flush Time spent inside the app alone is almost none. It's the calls to the OS that are costly. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list fltk@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
