Hi Troy
Yeah, to get the benefit you really have to set a bunch of constraints and
try to stay inside them it's usually best on a greenfield to be honest.
Andy
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Troy Goode <troygo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Andy,
>
> Evidently I had a version of the source from before IsBaseType was
> introduced. Once I refreshed and rebuilt the source I was able to get
> everything working. In the end, though, I decided to go back to using
> ClassMap<T> because I was having to create so many overrides for things like
> WithLengthOf(x) and CanNotBeNull() that it wasn't worth it for my particular
> project. It was a fun spike though!
>
> Troy
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Andrew Stewart <
> andrew.stew...@i-nnovate.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Troy
>> Here we go straight from the tests :o), always a good place to put things
>> you can't remember.
>>
>> var autoMapper = AutoPersistenceModel
>> .MapEntitiesFromAssemblyOf<ExampleClass>()
>> .Where(t => t.Namespace ==
>> "FluentNHibernate.AutoMap.TestFixtures.SuperTypes")
>> .WithConvention(c =>
>> {
>> c.IsBaseType = b => b ==
>> typeof(BaseEntity);
>> });
>>
>> That should do it for you.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Troy Goode <troygo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Andrew, that makes sense, but unfortunately I'm still not
>>> getting it to work. I added a convention for GetPrimaryKeyName, but
>>> wasn't able to determine what convention to use to change the
>>> baseobject to BaseEntity from object. When you have some time, any
>>> help would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Troy
>>>
>>> On Jan 6, 11:44 am, "Andrew Stewart" <andrew.stew...@i-nnovate.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Troy
>>> > I'm away from the code right now but the answers your are looking for
>>> are
>>> > under the WithConventions method.
>>> >
>>> > From there you can set your baseobject to be BaseEntity rather than
>>> object
>>> > and set GetPrimaryKeyName to be Id.
>>> >
>>> > Hope that helps if not i'll look it up when I'm back at a machine.
>>> >
>>> > Andy
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Troy Goode <troygo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Alright, I'm stumped. I have everything working fine with normal FNH,
>>> > > but once I tried to spike automapping I ran into an issue. In my
>>> > > project I have a base class for all of my entities like so:
>>> >
>>> > > public abstract class BaseEntity
>>> > > {
>>> > > public virtual int? Id { get; set; }
>>> > > public virtual DateTime? DateCreated { get; set; }
>>> > > public virtual DateTime? DateLastModified { get; set; }
>>> > > public virtual DateTime? DateDeleted { get; set; }
>>> > > }
>>> >
>>> > > So an example of one of my entities would be:
>>> >
>>> > > public class Foo : BaseEntity
>>> > > {
>>> > > public virtual string Name { get; set; }
>>> > > }
>>> >
>>> > > Finally, my autopersit setup looks like so:
>>> >
>>> > > var persistanceModel = AutoPersistenceModel
>>> > > .MapEntitiesFromAssemblyOf<Foo>()
>>> > > .Where( t=> t.Namespace == "MyNamespace" && t.Name !=
>>> > > "BaseEntity" )
>>> > > .ForTypesThatDeriveFrom<BaseEntity>( t=>
>>> > > {
>>> > > t.Id( e => e.Id, "Id"
>>> );
>>> > > t.Map( e=>
>>> e.DateCreated );
>>> > > t.Map( e=>
>>> > > e.DateLastModified );
>>> > > t.Map( e=>
>>> e.DateDeleted );
>>> > > } );
>>> >
>>> > > The problem I've encountered is that when NH goes to generate its
>>> > > query, it comes up with something like so:
>>> >
>>> > > SELECT
>>> > > this_.BaseEntityId as Id0_0_,
>>> > > this_1_.DateLastModified as DateLast2_0_0_,
>>> > > this_1_.DateDeleted as DateDele3_0_0_,
>>> > > this_1_.DateCreated as DateCrea4_0_0_,
>>> > > this_.Name as Name0_0_
>>> > > FROM
>>> > > Foo this_
>>> > > inner join [BaseEntity] this_1_
>>> > > on this_.BaseEntityId=this_1_.Id
>>> >
>>> > > This will not work as my table structure is simply:
>>> >
>>> > > Foo
>>> > > - Id
>>> > > - Name
>>> > > - DateCreated
>>> > > - DateLastModified
>>> > > - DateDeleted
>>> >
>>> > > Like I said, I have everything working with ClassMap, it is only when
>>> > > I try to use AutoPersistence that the issue arises... so two
>>> > > questions:
>>> > > 1) How do I configure things so that BaseEntity is not assumed to be
>>> > > another table?
>>> > > 2) How do I configure things so that the Id property maps to the "Id"
>>> > > column, rather than (the non-existent) "BaseEntityId" column?
>>> >
>>> > > Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > =================
>>> > I-nnovate Software - Bespoke Software Development, uk wirral.
>>> http://www.i-nnovate.net
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> =================
>> I-nnovate Software - Bespoke Software Development, uk wirral.
>> http://www.i-nnovate.net
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>
--
=================
I-nnovate Software - Bespoke Software Development, uk wirral.
http://www.i-nnovate.net
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
