It all becomes clear now...excellent! At the end, it was worth writing the the dog turd I published far too late in the evening, if only to obtain this valuable piece of information!
On Jun 9, 9:51 pm, Hudson Akridge <[email protected]> wrote: > Overheard on the dev boards:*James*: *"Then, after they've got ruby > installed, they'll be forced to build. Little do they know it all factors > into my ultimate plan to take over the world! We have a step in the build > process that leeches bio-energy that's transferred directly from their brain > waves. We'll collect this energy into vials and sell it on the black market > as a cure-all drug, collapsing the entire pharmaceutical economy overnight. > Finally, payback against the Joes will be ours!"* > > *Us*: "*HAIL COBRA!"* > > <Takes off in a subterranean motorcycle drill> > > True story. > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Steven Harman <[email protected]> wrote: > > agreed. of course, I'm probably a bit of an outlier as I tend to use Rake > > to automate the dumbest of tasks... > >http://stevenharman.net/blog/archive/2009/05/29/being-lazy-with-rake....) > > > -steve > > > //---- 90% of being smart is knowing what you're dumb at ----// > >http://stevenharman.net/ > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:14 PM, James Gregory > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> For the record, in the year or so that FNH has been public this is the > >> first complaint about the use of ruby I've heard of. > > >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Wayne Douglas <[email protected] > >> > wrote: > > >>> I actually thought the build process for FNH was a wicked example of how > >>> it could be done :s > > >>> stress does bad things to people - expecially when they really really > >>> want it to "just work" > > >>>http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla... > > >>> Once you have ruby+gems installed you're off. > > >>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:34 PM, James Gregory > >>> <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>>> Do I actually need to justify this with a response? It's my project, > >>>> I'll use whatever tool I want. You don't like it, tough. > >>>> Fact is, you don't need to install it. There are prebuilt binaries on > >>>> the website, and you're perfectly capable of building it without ruby > >>>> using > >>>> VS. > > >>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:27 PM, fquednau <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>>>> I have spent, sorry, wasted, the past hour to get some ruby running on > >>>>> this windows 7 machine. I have reached the point where some obscure > >>>>> part in ActiveRecord (Why would I need this for building > >>>>> FluentNhibernate?) screams for some ftools that apparently are part of > >>>>> any standard ruby library but not in mine. Hm. > > >>>>> Maybe I am just too stupid but why on Earth do I have to install a > >>>>> script language with x gems and at the end I have to resort to open > >>>>> the solution file and compile the stuff? > > >>>>> I know ruby is fashionable and all and you all have grown a huge > >>>>> allergy towards anything <that><looks><like><that> (There, now I've > >>>>> hit you!). But really, is it THAT much better than a silly little > >>>>> msbuild script or something like that? > > >>>>> Will we have to target the DLR with a new script language, BUILDOR, > >>>>> with totally <> free syntax (yes, even i <= 2 will be i lt= 2) to make > >>>>> you guys happy? > > >>>>> Right, enough ranting for now, I actually want to have some fun with > >>>>> FluentNhibernate! > > >>> -- > >>> Cheers, > > >>> w:// > > -- > - Hudsonhttp://www.bestguesstheory.comhttp://twitter.com/HudsonAkridge --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
