LOL, but that doesn't exactly cover the functionality of the rake file.  :)

I do think .net OSS is missing an equivalent of gems...  I know
there's foal, but I suspect that unless Microsoft delivered one, we'll
never see any adoption...

J

On 26/06/2009, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well really, a build from scratch doesn't require ruby. msbuild
> src\FluentNHibernate.sln should do the trick.
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Julian Birch <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> A buildfromscratch.bat wouldn't go amiss, but I'm not sure how easy an
>> unattended clean ruby install would be (read: as far as I can figure out,
>> it's nigh-on impossible).
>> Would it be possible to get it working with ironruby?  Just a thought.
>>
>> J
>>
>> 2009/6/26 Frank L. Quednau <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>> It all becomes clear now...excellent! At the end, it was worth writing
>>> the the dog turd I published far too late in the evening, if only to
>>> obtain this valuable piece of information!
>>>
>>> On Jun 9, 9:51 pm, Hudson Akridge <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Overheard on the dev boards:*James*: *"Then, after they've got ruby
>>> > installed, they'll be forced to build. Little do they know it all
>>> factors
>>> > into my ultimate plan to take over the world! We have a step in the
>>> build
>>> > process that leeches bio-energy that's transferred directly from their
>>> brain
>>> > waves. We'll collect this energy into vials and sell it on the black
>>> market
>>> > as a cure-all drug, collapsing the entire pharmaceutical economy
>>> overnight.
>>> > Finally, payback against the Joes will be ours!"*
>>> >
>>> > *Us*: "*HAIL COBRA!"*
>>> >
>>> > <Takes off in a subterranean motorcycle drill>
>>> >
>>> > True story.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Steven Harman <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > agreed. of course, I'm probably a bit of an outlier as I tend to use
>>> Rake
>>> > > to automate the dumbest of tasks...
>>> > >
>>> http://stevenharman.net/blog/archive/2009/05/29/being-lazy-with-rake....)
>>> >
>>> > > -steve
>>> >
>>> > > //----  90% of being smart is knowing what you're dumb at  ----//
>>> > >http://stevenharman.net/
>>> >
>>> > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:14 PM, James Gregory <
>>> [email protected]>wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >> For the record, in the year or so that FNH has been public this is
>>> the
>>> > >> first complaint about the use of ruby I've heard of.
>>> >
>>> > >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Wayne Douglas <
>>> [email protected]
>>> > >> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >>> I actually thought the build process for FNH was a wicked example
>>> > >>> of
>>> how
>>> > >>> it could be done :s
>>> >
>>> > >>> stress does bad things to people - expecially when they really
>>> really
>>> > >>> want it to "just work"
>>> >
>>> > >>>
>>> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla...
>>> >
>>> > >>> Once you have ruby+gems installed you're off.
>>> >
>>> > >>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:34 PM, James Gregory <
>>> [email protected]>wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >>>> Do I actually need to justify this with a response? It's my
>>> project,
>>> > >>>> I'll use whatever tool I want. You don't like it, tough.
>>> > >>>> Fact is, you don't need to install it. There are prebuilt binaries
>>> on
>>> > >>>> the website, and you're perfectly capable of building it without
>>> ruby using
>>> > >>>> VS.
>>> >
>>> > >>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:27 PM, fquednau <[email protected]
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >>>>> I have spent, sorry, wasted, the past hour to get some ruby
>>> running on
>>> > >>>>> this windows 7 machine. I have reached the point where some
>>> obscure
>>> > >>>>> part in ActiveRecord (Why would I need this for building
>>> > >>>>> FluentNhibernate?) screams for some ftools that apparently are
>>> part of
>>> > >>>>> any standard ruby library but not in mine. Hm.
>>> >
>>> > >>>>> Maybe I am just too stupid but why on Earth do I have to install
>>> > >>>>> a
>>> > >>>>> script language with x gems and at the end I have to resort to
>>> open
>>> > >>>>> the solution file and compile the stuff?
>>> >
>>> > >>>>> I know ruby is fashionable and all and you all have grown a huge
>>> > >>>>> allergy towards anything <that><looks><like><that> (There, now
>>> I've
>>> > >>>>> hit you!). But really, is it THAT much better than a silly little
>>> > >>>>> msbuild script or something like that?
>>> >
>>> > >>>>> Will we have to target the DLR with a new script language,
>>> BUILDOR,
>>> > >>>>> with totally <> free syntax (yes, even i <= 2 will be i lt= 2) to
>>> make
>>> > >>>>> you guys happy?
>>> >
>>> > >>>>> Right, enough ranting for now, I actually want to have some fun
>>> with
>>> > >>>>> FluentNhibernate!
>>> >
>>> > >>> --
>>> > >>> Cheers,
>>> >
>>> > >>> w://
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > - Hudsonhttp://www.bestguesstheory.comhttp://twitter.com/HudsonAkridge
>>>
>>>
>>
>> >
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to