damn! and I guess moving to C++11 is not an option On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Tom M. <tom.m...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> This is for C++11 only. > > And as I just learned: The threading part of C11 is optional, which is > very disappointing. Because it means that even though clang and gcc claim > to be feature complete, glibc is (still) lacking support for the IMO most > important part of C11: Threading ( see https://sourceware.org/ > bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14092 ) > > Thus it is questionable if we can ever move to C11, even if one day also > glibc has C11 Thread support. > > > Tom > > > 2017-10-06 16:56 GMT+02:00 Philippe Simons <simons.phili...@gmail.com>: > >> According to https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh567368.aspx >> >> VS2015 should have decent enough C11 support for threads and atomics. >> Or is only for C++11 ? >> >> Philippe >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fluid-dev mailing list >> fluid-dev@nongnu.org >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > fluid-dev mailing list > fluid-dev@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev > >
_______________________________________________ fluid-dev mailing list fluid-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
