On 25-Sep-08, at 9:16 AM, Jacob Farber wrote: > On that not, some libraries use "sorting" and sortable elements > rather than "re-ordering".... >
That's a good point, Jacob. If I recall correctly, I think we considered that, but decided against it because 'sorting' implies certain functionality that we don't support, like alphabetical sort, increasing vs. decreasing, etc. -- Anastasia Cheetham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Designer, Fluid Project http://fluidproject.org Adaptive Technology Resource Centre / University of Toronto _______________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list [email protected] http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
